- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old7 m" Y& k- R1 c) K8 N: f7 ^ n7 A
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical4 w! f8 r5 k6 S S
Exposure to Testosterone8 P1 \4 T6 A* J3 s/ g0 s# w9 z
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2( y8 v! R2 l/ ?( J
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
! a- z3 Q; {8 t) qClinical Pediatrics7 j( ]. L- L6 N2 A6 [
Volume 46 Number 65 x7 O5 m, `2 E5 f* P
July 2007 540-543
) _2 M+ k: l8 ?& M& c© 2007 Sage Publications
* A2 S5 F/ E( Y0 p10.1177/0009922806296651
6 |+ h: b- A" R' }5 s( jhttp://clp.sagepub.com
4 j# O+ v* k4 E! e: `0 X2 M7 G; jhosted at
8 v% r) Q: w1 {4 [* rhttp://online.sagepub.com6 _) D* `/ g, j5 E% I& q
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
# J D, c/ U( Q: e) }& s6 m3 Eis a significant concern for physicians. Central
& P. C$ c7 k% n! cprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
% M% X5 G/ y* f2 ~0 q) qthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
7 N' J3 M' W: G0 L ia higher incidence of organic central nervous system
+ G1 F. b4 ?. A; Slesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
( o( m% y7 R# x; b- g3 Hby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic- a% v% o' @$ B
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
2 i( V; q* }- G9 z9 Pcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
% j$ Y9 |0 x! e* M, z; B2 @ V( treport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the7 c R# A4 I# w$ B$ P& O3 i! {" k8 w
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-9 ~( R5 w1 U' z9 }. e0 |7 f
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due7 y$ H$ @! }9 W# D
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
; _7 ~' _7 a2 U: H; d- [3 Q% cthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-
5 E2 M7 x0 U5 W* |3 W$ c% smation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
( W4 [0 F. M" p) G. P' L' L/ Kchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
7 }7 W2 I! U# W- o6 q. o" Ptestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
& ~- j, N( M/ d8 ?( @0 M5 ably more common than the rare case report in the
1 `* k+ d* ]. D9 g$ E- ^, fliterature.4
: e; b m: F5 u$ ]Patient Report
% {. [% V; C/ |( l8 L$ ` xA 16-month-old white child was referred to the
8 m9 m% B3 y0 h% |5 aendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
* X( G! K/ [ a M. bof early sexual development. His mother noticed+ o; \4 b" w6 K! g E
light colored pubic hair development when he was
! ~+ w) H" d% T: CFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of9 J$ r, M" k% D3 T5 t
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
# F) d4 I% F0 s/ a7 K$ JAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
4 l* z4 o+ o' \Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of( l. b5 D+ p3 [2 J
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
0 b' h6 j: \; e0 w9 ie-mail: [email protected].3 C" q2 Y- L. K9 W. d/ Q G) @
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became$ |8 v) ?& _! ^+ C0 Q
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
& Z* M0 v" P* z* V7 I% k! I2 oment of his penis and frequent erections. The child( l- _8 R' M6 C- E& u4 i, |7 l4 \
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with- y) T7 B/ m# E" o& X4 U! r% D* G
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of* G) ]) Z, p2 w8 I
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year0 F$ u6 ]% P' l+ c8 Q- j
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
) K" _1 X4 w: M8 C4 ~# u& j! W3 s9 Zsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
. ? A/ G9 D( f$ Y/ k, p7 R6 Q. Uand his psychosocial and psychomotor development
2 l+ _ X* C( J3 C/ O4 Q+ Hwas age appropriate.
& C4 p; m, D* S& o3 q& m+ HThe family history was remarkable for the father,
6 s* W; ~5 K# {; g: ]) Owho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,+ E" W" c/ t+ I5 e8 c$ p
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
( Y! `5 J4 X( E$ c" v, C* Theight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat' {$ }7 a) P( K; B% j
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
9 d- K8 ?0 p6 d( I) FThe father denied taking any other medication. The& S$ U2 b$ c0 C% l- x
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche2 |: b1 A- M+ v! e2 W% y
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet& ~( H# E0 b6 f# ~$ i
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-7 n' w& n" b1 l# b
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-: T) l" M$ A/ ^& z/ j" B$ p5 L
tives. There were no siblings.
; [# L8 }4 T% ]: ]3 x( SPhysical Examination/ V1 P# q) u, D1 R2 x- Y
The physical examination revealed a very active,
& X7 M1 j4 Z: e* Qplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented. w- V) _& O# ^2 b$ E4 w ~; g4 G
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was2 L# ~1 Y/ \8 C8 ?! {- a5 z
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
% B5 E8 y; |0 f(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
8 Z- V: S8 B7 y: G1 E! tvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of1 F+ a) ^1 p' j6 }" g) P" V7 F
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement. I9 u h. v5 ?6 B# _/ h( S$ X
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
0 ?3 C6 p2 d6 S: Denlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of' L; K0 P5 N$ K# n+ S; Y( l# c
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
# K; Q' V P( B% s1 g! Mdeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
) x ]2 V, E& |9 \# m, W% @! |$ E5400 o7 D! V1 P/ E2 z, }" h, H, w3 Y* U
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from. E- }. h. z+ j% ]
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The: z# d( P" ^' j/ \+ _5 m& z
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
3 n% b( }6 [( c D2 m' t$ B2 NThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
7 ~% y. s+ S- _, z5 W7 f5 hoily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
: H1 |0 f! v, c7 Q/ B$ U5 rabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
& B( y/ U% T: {# _, c; t6 R. k+ ^* CNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+/ W) n* E7 g; D9 ~, A
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
; V% N4 o H6 q* d* Y% I7 ?/ {2 ?of papilledema.
0 F8 ~# b0 j4 jLaboratory Evaluation6 d. t6 p3 G$ d$ {3 v. h" Z6 j
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
6 z( A5 |' A$ b9 Q% c% m+ M1 j2 Ousing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-. s: Q5 l- ~ G& Y
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
( o) R8 x/ { |* e1 k- A+ {3 ^8 J4 }karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test/ f1 H# U7 b0 Q& G
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-( t7 [2 A( Y6 U+ J" D# ^: U
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).9 ^) Z. f( S: v! g+ j
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood7 H# ~" i% V; G; R% s
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
; P. }+ P% y8 z7 Mwithin normal range for his age. The concentration& L7 Q, i' N/ m' B+ g
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL3 l E: n9 c' i, N% g& L' s) U
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20( Y; u- L: }) A( v! b
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
# D- D1 @2 Z, v5 L+ i8 Sterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),& M5 g5 s8 S4 J! H$ `( @
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
& @& S& f5 G6 |- @# @7 }, t49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)6 p( \/ h5 n3 I5 F# K/ y- M- x/ {
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
4 l1 q8 W- ?0 Ntisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
s; K. S; Z$ Mtestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
# i; v7 W# J3 y) |" {and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
) A; ^( `1 U% E" V! Y5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular+ |+ l. s; X' ^
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
; b5 n: B" C& Q5 F% @' H7 jconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
9 z) _0 F4 ]& a* K- x" L1 |(prepubertal).
a- T! K( l1 d, D0 W' J- |The parents were notified about the laboratory7 z/ z+ H& l/ ?' z7 W$ K& ^$ h" X2 \; x
results and were informed that all of the tests were% |' U4 p9 g1 U
normal except the testosterone level was high. The
6 h# V+ r1 v) e g# ~; V Dfollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
: Y) D* ~9 S1 Tobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
5 C7 t% D9 U5 U9 sever, the family did not return for 4 months.
# T2 c/ v% u( WPhysical examination at this time revealed that the1 ]5 L: e+ }) r' ]" i) \8 ^
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained& I) O j0 d1 \5 Z
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained! @/ ]7 p3 A3 D! `; |, V
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
; [* h" x( \0 a: w, F& a) kpletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
) n5 t5 C% S0 t2 h7 M. z+ Gthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2+ j |, `9 t' y6 c
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
& `, f; [6 }; u) D8 bThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-! K+ n$ A3 z1 j q; M7 e+ |6 f: j
ing frequent erections.
1 ~) Q0 X2 {5 @3 ABoth parents were again questioned about use of
! ~% G0 R! l( L% T* bany ointment/creams that they may have applied to# G" r" Y6 w! x6 \) d1 y
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the* E4 R( `7 z& {+ X
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541& ?: y: B- N0 C( o! \4 a
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
! V7 {) x2 L- X, O+ C7 [1 sing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for# }$ |: s! o8 f5 F! Q6 Y" N
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
( v( r7 P. j/ ^; z" Fto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
$ D% O' ~! v3 u) Z) i7 ~scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
- K5 P3 H" F! zsecondary to depression.
8 u4 {: @* \5 z% D/ aThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
, j+ }. e4 ?' _7 y; a- q! r4 r* aThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
4 ~; E2 ^% ^) O$ p' |% T4 E5 Gchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-+ L! {8 D5 {" X# y; S0 h
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.0 {+ K2 }, H6 O, }! p. N# A
The father also admitted that after the phone call,
- v1 {2 `5 ^! \3 h- nwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby% m( f* S( C+ q; J& @
was high, he then read the product information
( O3 x5 B, i6 `$ ]% I2 ypacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-) D. f$ J3 I- c: n
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
& T5 _' J7 ?& D8 ~6 J+ t$ tdecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
+ Y( W( Z5 N6 D. x0 Q4 I+ Q: ofather was not hugging him with bare skin and had( ^# T; f' ` k/ a# Z; [
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone3 J9 C8 K w& r+ l
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the7 i' r& R/ Q' M2 }0 X# F9 p6 ]1 v
laboratory to obtain the test.3 Z! a4 d7 I5 O& h+ T% N
Discussion9 F' u- H5 Q9 M" t( p5 }
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
! m3 l! y& t* _sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4& T( q% P7 u% b1 U3 o ~
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
& q1 U6 Z& l9 R1 Y0 oit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-7 y! G0 i+ W+ T
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
6 |. n' [; Z- S5 \+ f) i/ Rmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP# D& G; p |3 W; }2 X
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
2 z8 h% o' {% U. P5 Nresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
8 E9 \! B! m. V* F) zamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-- {1 [' h% [/ z0 ?
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
% t" ~: L/ e: p+ u9 bboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-" O! A+ l. ^) O1 }9 F
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
* c7 k) q$ X9 r8 m/ F: N. m4 Jrical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by/ Y1 z: g* Z( f& M
gonadotropins.1,3
0 \. e- `. {* E1 V1 b/ |Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco- {6 |) U" ^* t+ y3 `
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate0 C4 t% g6 l( _1 S- D
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
: E: i4 ^* V2 \5 w: M0 B& \exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
/ ] R% d, D( D1 qulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
8 W; Y* C& \7 E& O) qcongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
0 V# x$ V, ~* b) n! p3 madrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious6 R' k" u* j( q7 G0 N
puberty in boys.3,4. p+ N# D! n9 R( J& K/ T; `
The most common form of congenital adrenal5 ^! [! D$ I4 ?6 i: m0 O
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
' S: F* L5 n; ? tThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
7 `; d5 D; k5 Z- F% _excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
8 B4 O4 w. o7 p. ean adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
' R7 _, G* H7 B2 B: Eexcess.1,3
# T+ ~/ A# _$ ~3 I* c" |at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from/ i: q; a/ O; p; U5 U
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007! E% v8 [ t2 f; E. n
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
/ D2 p9 G, J3 C+ o; R2 Rindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
' V( S% e/ a' J( ?" ias testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
/ e- x6 L- T) g. q; c3 C0 Ivery young age. The physical findings in these boys
1 V: m- R4 r8 l& ]2 f1 A2 I' Swith this disorder are full pubertal development,& O5 {$ y4 y4 X6 K, T6 F
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
, x9 [/ N4 }6 ]3 t( L1 n7 l0 @0 Uwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder; W: `8 P/ q0 h/ C- I+ s+ O9 {3 T: {
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
* C, [% T+ y9 z7 W& K6 Dpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
# W- q' U& M6 F/ F0 q! ^! E+ o& Jreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked0 \: K, u3 P; u2 O3 ]1 H
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only2 }$ b2 Z1 B: N* c
males; therefore, other male members of the family
- f# ]. l6 [3 @& @% O5 F% @/ D, ?may have similar precocious puberty.3
% l' b% z9 l2 Z* @6 A5 vIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
6 m+ V r5 O7 F5 w9 n6 o, @4 ]$ Fsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
9 R& y7 [: S' z& A% fcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis$ r0 A+ b% x/ }; P
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
! G" g2 c8 P3 s1 q0 Z" istarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
: G1 V; I; Z$ ]/ x* e6 X% Q8 M) Atesticular enlargement is not that evident in the5 w: E$ C, J" i3 x; T, U. ]! t
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-- \# \/ {. D5 K
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our7 m( H/ ?: G8 n2 E- a5 N9 O4 j
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
Y- C# J+ F: @( {7 C! m6 q4 Neither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase6 g7 I8 A) o5 u: F. _
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
% @5 |5 ^; t: r7 oing the normal level of adrenal steroids." R2 J# [1 G$ N& a
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly, k) t. x! n% Y9 A' g1 Z
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
" o% @1 b8 c" H) Bthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-+ {, t `4 M) g! H) l) C
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and$ e" o9 @" t7 q3 W+ R1 F
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
0 W8 X. F( K( ]2 F7 ?, d' ^# Eterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
. \" f+ G, y0 }6 L& H9 tusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’/ D8 c4 @1 l4 a
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
, ]* K/ u- q7 w& J0 m) qcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
1 ^/ L3 P* j, G" \2 vunprotected females through direct skin exposure.; e0 h: P* ?% o2 W5 }9 ?9 ~
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the5 p) R, T/ {: Z7 |* t, q* U
baseline value in those females who were exposed to1 d- }; X& M/ e$ J! @
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
# I0 z# H6 `0 z0 R0 R; \- Mpartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-* w$ H. S. l k1 [! ^2 s, F1 q! O8 f
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.) s1 g V" \" [: @* f" a! Z
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
' t9 ?6 g* G' S5 ^which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that" q. X' F& [7 z8 K4 `9 b* i9 s5 E
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-9 G7 W% C7 p% U- W t1 c9 Z
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
3 D/ Q' n) a% i& p0 f" b% G' L; v" vactive in young children exposed to testosterone
6 N; q4 J- K; n' h& @) nexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-3 t8 r6 x1 f K* X4 j; g% Q
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to* R9 O- a2 ]& ~2 @
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
@9 ~% |6 b* L1 u. hchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
1 e2 E: ~$ h! T3 Oadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
) Y" k1 X6 G& ?, G7 ?9 U2 u/ `The long-term effect of androgen exposure during$ _6 T5 X+ x. H% D
early childhood on pubertal development and final/ _8 n1 V% C U3 a; l5 y
adult height are not fully known and always remain
5 z4 ]3 D) q, _5 ^1 [; ~ Qa concern. Children treated with short-term testos-3 q# r9 e2 [8 j6 R5 t. l; B6 [7 Q/ D
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some* i; {( V! j" @2 ~/ ^
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after4 g2 G" z2 h! {7 u3 Q: `
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation' I( h" c! J, s S2 Q
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9$ b8 j- ?* b) O- n* |) { R( G# O
There are conflicting reports and controversy' t7 m: \) X2 Y" ^
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult! |2 `9 o M* {; |9 I7 j* {* p
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
) m G6 {/ u. S$ t, o* c9 }adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
8 i. d) z' x# @+ t8 I1 f3 R. ]ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
4 O' Z9 r1 i( _2 Z* l# `Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between& T& L {) }( {# y7 X r
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult1 i9 s5 D+ h0 ~
penile length in clinical studies.% `. f. @: U; ?
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is3 |5 Y1 {/ E3 i! d
going to experience any of the untoward effects from% A/ W) B; ~$ d$ i" l5 A
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
6 U$ G* m/ O9 B/ V- q0 L Kthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
/ z5 x- w6 M+ R6 Q" G1 Q5 ]Although the bone age was advanced at the time of
" L. M! X4 i$ m. qdiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
0 Z% ^. g( A2 V% h4 D0 xthe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
% @, x, m% r% Hheight will not be affected.
5 `) X& B/ t4 |* K0 v! U4 ?+ i- CAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-0 O1 X3 _" P. ^% Y; ? R
ability of androgen products in our society may3 }" t3 o2 o9 w* P1 y
indeed cause more virilization in male or female& z ?" M% R7 [2 m% E& x! q
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
. ]+ W. V# _7 l% Zgen products must be considered and specific ques-3 ^2 e. i( _4 R! S ]0 O2 x0 D$ I
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or5 C3 J% b" t8 E" X* J
gel should be asked of the family members during
6 j* t/ Y3 y# f1 D8 mthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-
! B2 V7 ~. F7 V1 E6 p# w7 j- q8 Uilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
& ~/ C: o2 D# C9 s+ K6 f+ g, K9 p/ O3 rnosis can be established by just a few tests and by" n% f/ ?4 g) c& ?0 R2 Q H
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
" {( c6 @6 z3 R) g& f% ?6 Yhistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
+ j$ d. W' D; C# z' l/ a$ y6 U7 cresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
" } c% X' ~+ P- `" Xinvestigation. The primary care physician should be l9 S! Y4 u7 r+ h* o5 B U
aware of this fact, because most of these children3 O' D- M' ^5 A
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’; B9 l4 F% G2 Y! R* D
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a2 j: K8 M# C( d1 K9 x
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or, @$ T; {$ A9 n7 ?2 h2 z
female child who might come in contact with some-
R& s& Z& M4 v' M Xone using any of these products.
% U7 P* g3 [8 T9 gReferences8 G- b* a/ K8 O2 j* ]1 F5 w
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation' O6 m: j( z: e t' J# Y( Y
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
) t, W' k: f* s* V5 k5 x0 _Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
5 d8 @4 ?, }: t2 o2002: 565-628.
0 k3 Z# { g. M2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
' g7 j% b+ z$ y. \. I2 J% Bpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|